By PAI, ILCA Associate Member
From ILCA
WASHINGTON (PAI)--GOP President George W. Bush's partial Social Security privatization plan makes retirement less secure while opening retireees' payments to hazards of 'Enronization,' AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney says.
In a long, detailed analysis of Bush's privatization scheme, Sweeney also noted the president wants his 'private investment accounts' to return only money people would expect above their regular Social Security payments.
'Americans deserve the Social Security benefits we have paid for and we will not accept a privatization plan that makes retirement less secure,' Sweeney stated.
'And we will not accept the notion that keeping our elderly out of poverty is not 'fiscally sustainable' while tax breaks for millionaires are,' he added.
Bush did not mention the cost of Social Security privatization. His plan would divert one-sixth of the system's payroll tax revenues into the private accounts, starting in 2009.
In his post-election news conference, Bush also said he wanted to convert the nation's universal Social Security pension system from a traditional pension plan to a 401(k)-like 'defined contribution plan,' such as many corporations now have.
Independent economists and some lawmakers say conversion would cost $2 trillion over a decade for 'transition costs' to pay current and pending retirees, even as Social Security's revenue drops. Economists add Bush's tax cuts for the rich cost $1.9 trillion over that time.
'Last night Bush may have been fuzzy about his plans for Social Security,' Sweeney said. 'But he made clear that when he talks about fiscal discipline, he means disciplining working families and the most vulnerable' to 'benefit the very rich. When he talks about an 'ownership' society, he means a 'You're on your ownership' society.'
The AFL-CIO has joined a broad-based coalition to fight Bush's privatization scheme, which the president took on the road just after his Feb. 2 speech. But the federation and its partners also plan to draft alternatives to cure Social Security's future ills, which will not start for years.
Those alternatives will provide 'common-sense fixes' for Social Security for present and future retirees and for younger workers, Sweeney promised.
But Sweeney spent more of his analysis on faults of Bush's plan. His data were taken from White House background fact sheets and papers. 'Here's what we didn't hear,' Sweeney said:
'Decisions about Americans' retirement security should be based on what's best for average people, not tied to politicians' wealthy friends or companies that have political influence,' Sweeney said.
'When the president talks to America about something as serious as working families' retirement security, we need to hear sound facts and straight talk. But that's not what we heard from President Bush,' he declared.
» Go to more articles from PA's online edition. | » Go to sample articles from this month's print edition | » Support PA with your subscription |