Memories of Martin Luther King


Today is Martin Luther King Day in the United States.  It has been a national holiday for a generation-even though Ronald Reagan and other rightwing Republican politicians delayed that for years after King's 1968 assassination.  


Public offices and schools will be closed.  There will be some ceremonies in communities and most people will do what they do on most holidays, both religious and non-religious (what they are expected to do) go shopping, watch sports events on television, and prepare for work the following day.


There will be references of course to King's legacy.  Republican politicians (many of whom fought for years to prevent his birthday from becoming a national holiday) will distort everything that King lived and died for.

In the process, they buried in rituals of celebration the reality of segregation, de facto and de jure, disenfranchisement, supported terroristic violence represented in the 1920s by a KKK that numbered in the millions.As for African Americans, when they were remembered  before positively before the civil rights movement  it was through a handful of individuals, the accommodationist  leader Booker T. Washington, the scientist George Washington Carver, and most of all the fictional character, Uncle Tom, in the novel Uncle Tom's Cabin.  Frederick Douglass, Sojourner Truth and of course W.E.B. Dubois who had long  himself as a scholar and activist with a global reputation  simply didn't exist in the conventional reality of their own country.

They will make him into an opponent of affirmative action, economic and social integration as "reverse racism" (they usually throw in John F. Kennedy's.  speech about "taking race out of American politics" for good measure )when they have done routinely for many years..  Other "conservatives "  will also damn King with false praise, crediting him with ending segregation and thus eliminating racism from U.S. politics and society.


In the 1920s, novelist Sinclair Lewis at the time of the opening of the Lincoln Memorial wrote cynically that Abraham Lincoln was the "patron saint of America," the common man who freed the slaves and then, Christ-like, died for the sins of the Republic. Today there are those who seek to make Martin Luther King into a sort of "patron saint" for fictional U.S. where racism no longer exists.  And there are many more who control school curricula who teach children that the most important thing about King was that he preached and practiced non-violence-in essence he was the "good Black" in contrast to Malcolm X, the "bad Black," (although you usually have to get to high school and sometimes to college to hear Malcolm X mentioned in school curricula).  


But the real King and his real legacy lives on directly today in peoples struggle-most dramatically in the Occupy movements through the nation.

 

For King non violence was both a strategy and a philosophy united by the concept of "positive peace," peace with social justice.  He agreed with Mohandas K Gandhi, the teacher/activist who led the Indian Independence movement that poverty was the greatest violence.  He rejected entirely the view that integration without   any change in the distribution of income, without large advances in economic and social equality, was either possible or desirable   

He broke with the Johnson administration that advanced through its war on poverty and civil rights legislation everything that he had fought for on the Vietnam War because he realized that war itself, imperialist war with in this case a clear and large racist subtext   was the worst enemy of positive peace.

And he at the end of his life organized a "Poor Peoples Movement, of all ethno cultural groups in poverty to launch go Washington, not simply to march but to stay there, the way the bonus marchers did in 1932, to force the Johnson administration to confront the gap between and its promises of a war on poverty and a great society and the realities in the U.S..  

And he was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee, supporting a strike of public employees, African-American sanitation workers, who as workers, public workers, and African Americans in a "right to work," segregationist state which chronically underfunded education and other public services, were triply oppressed.

This was the real Martin Luther King  and he lives today directly in the Occupy movement everywhere.  He lives also in public employees everywhere he are fighting against draconian anti-labor actions being pushed in Wisconsin, New Jersey, and many other states.

He lives also in the opposition to both wars and a military budget over  600 billion dollars(ten times greater than it was during the Vietnam War ) and a federal deficit more than fifty times greater than it was, thanks to military  spending and tax cuts, then it was at the end of the Vietnam War.

We have an African American president, Barack Obama, attempting to advance progressive policies by cautiously moving through the political mine fields of four decades of reactionary Republican (Nixon through W Bush) and collaborationist Democratic (Carter+ Clinton) policies, zigging and zagging while seeking to move forward.  

I think the  King would like Obama, not because of the color of his skin, but because of the content of his character.  He would also probably be amused as the politicians who, proclaiming that Obama's election is evidence that racism no longer exists in the U.S out of one side of their mouths, try to make him into a national scapegoat for all of the society's problems, seeing him not as a servant of the people but as a servant above his station out of the other sides of their mouths.

The real King was always an optimist about what could be accomplished in this society and we should remember that he was the most important leader of the most important movement in the United States in the second half of the 20th century, a movement which he always understood that the struggle to advance equal rights and social-economic justice for an oppressed minority and for the whole society were both independent and dialectical, changing and interacting, either strengthening or weakening each other.  By combining that optimism and that realism, we can honor him best and help ourselves achieve through struggle the positive peace that he believed in and stood for.

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • Little while ago read the posting. good job !

    Posted by cribianix, 01/21/2012 3:46am (13 years ago)

  • Some friendly comments for my brother Markowitz, agreeing essentially, but critically.
    The real, the great, M L K would have basically disagreed with our current president Obama on war and war policy. King's break with Johnson on this would have been his break with Obama, for now as then, we cannot have war, preparation for war, and "smart war"and do anything reasonable to attack the looming bread and butter crisis for the international working class(which at its center is the environmental crisis, the dialectical connection between the earth's productive capacities and labor in a world ravaged, almost to the point of extinction, by capitalism itself) brought about by imperialism.
    As much as we vote for and support president Obama as he zig-zags through right wing "nullification and interposition"(from extending unemployment benefits to regulating massive, monopoly coal and oil industries)reminiscent of the George Wallaces, and Strom Thurmonds and Barry Goldwaters of King's time,
    he is bound to fail like president Johnson did, as one cannot support the war making imperialists(misadventures in Vietnam and in Afghanistan) and the peace making working class, while protecting the earth's(and our class's) ecology and environment, simultaneously.
    The great King was sharply aware of this antithesis, the necessity of non-violence and peace to heal the earth's wounds of poverty, war and illiteracy.
    We probably agree that only massive people's struggle will change the Obama war policy, which he outlined in his, sad to say, disgraceful Nobel Prize acceptance speech in Oslo(contrast this with M L K's graceful
    speech in 1964).
    The positive thing about our president Obama is that, objectively, due to his constituency, the vast, vast majority of U. S. citizenry, it is in a natural position to compel positive change in his more negative policies.
    As much a we love president Obama, at the end of the day, he is, like Michael Eric Dyson instructs, a politician, not a visionary like the great King, the great Mahatma, or, the great Communist, W. E. B. Du Bois.
    We must support our beleaguered president Obama.
    As one of our greatest people's congresspersons in the U. S.'s history, John Conyers, advocates, we must move him to support a more massive jobs program, and understand the dire need to support Employee Free Choice Act, alongside of electing him to a second term-he has proven to respond to his constituency.
    Let's remember King as a man of love and peace-one who would have excoriated any notion of "smart war"as you would say Norman, "always an optimist".

    Posted by E.E.W. Clay, 01/17/2012 11:23am (13 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments